The landmark shift in transparency in family courts comes at a pivotal moment: the same week that the identities of judges responsible for the historic decisions for Sara Sherif have been revealed. As ...

The judges who allowed Sara Sharif to remain in her father’s custody are to be named following a legal challenge mounted by the media which ...

In almost all cases, a parent or guardian is the very best person to judge a child’s needs, it is abhorrent that parental rights are being diminished so greatly by this bill, putting these decisions ...

Following a hearing which Judge Raeside oversaw, both parents, Ms Domin and Mr Sharif, continue to care for Sara at the family home. Surrey County Council are recorded as still concerned about ...

A judge who allowed Sara Sharif to live with the father who brutally murdered her was previously criticised by a High Court judge over a “fundamentally flawed” hearing regarding another child.

Three appeal judges ruled a week ago that the judges involved in historic family court proceedings concerning Sara could be ...

Judge Alison Raeside, Judge Peter Nathan and Judge Sally Williams were all involved in family court proceedings related to the 10-year-old between 2013 and 2019 ...

In October 2019, a social worker told a court they assessed that Sara Sharif's father and stepmother were "able to meet Sara and [a sibling's] needs for safety, stability, emotional warmth and ...

and Mr Sharif provide Z and U and are likely to provide to Sara”. Judge Raeside approved the children being placed under supervision orders, meaning the children stayed in their parents’ care ...